Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Login

|

2024
February 15
Webinar
LES India "Plausibility - Is It For Real?"
LES India
All

Website: https://www.lesi.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/les-india-webinar---25-feb-2024.pdf?sfvrsn=d4822ddd_2

Post filing evidence in patents - assessment for inventive step and plausibility

During patent prosecution and invalidity proceedings, it is common to submit post filing data and evidence to demonstrate the unexpected advantage or inventiveness of an invention.

A recent opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case number G0002/21 of March 2023 on plausibility seems to suggest that plausibility is emerging as a fourth pillar of patentability in several jurisdictions. The panel will examine 5 different jurisdictions (IN, GB, CA, US and AR) to examine the effect of the said opinion in their jurisdiction.