Kei Konishi
Nichi-ei International Patent Firm, Partner, Patent Attorney, Tokyo, Japan
Many companies are well aware of the value of patent licensing. The exclusivity of patents requires companies that want to produce or sell their products which are covered by another’s patent to obtain patent licenses from the patentees. It is, however, not surprising for a licensed patent to later be found to be irrelevant to the licensee’s product, which raises a dispute between the licensee and the licensor. What if a licensed patent is invalidated or a licensee’s product is found to be outside the scope of the licensed patent in later years? May a licensee seek monetary relief when a licensed patent is later found useless for operating its business? The Intellectual Property High Court (IP High Court) recently rendered a landmark decision addressing these issues in favor of not licensees but licensors in the “Pebble Bed Bath” Case, 2008 (Ne) o. 10070 (decided on January 28, 2009).
Read the Full Article:
Full articles are available only to LESI Members. Please login to view the PDF of this Les Nouvelles Article.
Not an LESI member? Find out how to join your regional LES society and gain access to all that your LES society and LESI has to offer.