Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Login

|

Review Of Key Clauses In University or Biotechnology Industry Licensing Agreements

Shinae Kim-Helms
Patent Attorney, Intellectual Property Law Group, LLP, San Jose, CA, USA

Universities produce a large amount of inventions every year and are a useful source of intellectual property. More companies are realizing the importance of gaining access to this source of intellectual property through technology transfer.

To reduce any likely disputes stemming from poorly drafted technology transfer agreements between universities and the biotechnology industry, understanding licensing agreements that pertain to universities is critical. This paper reviews the mechanism of each key clause of a licensing agreement, the potential related disputes and how to avoid those disputes.

First, the Definition Clause deals with definitions of key terms in the agreement and becomes a basis for resolution when parties disagree. Second, the Grant Clause determines the kinds of rights given in the agreement—exclusive or non-exclusive rights, material subject to license, sublicensing/assignment of rights to third parties, and field of use. Third, the Best Efforts/Due Diligence Clause imposes the licensees’ obligation to commercialize the licensed technology. Fourth, the Royalty Clause is a highlight of the agreement and five different types of royalties will be covered: (1) upfront payments, (2) minimum annual royalties, (3) earned royalties (running royalties), (4) reach-through royalties, (5) patent cost, and (6) royalty-free licenses. Fifth, most university agreements that cover patented technology contain a provision about infringement by others. This clause predicts how both parties will act if they have to bring an infringement action or defend one. Lastly, various other clauses such as Termination, Warranties and Indemnification, and Confidentiality will be covered. Warranties and Indemnification, and Confidentiality Clauses connected with a university’s publication policies may be peculiarly controversial in university licensing agreements because they often cover the conflicting policies between the industry and universities. This paper presents a summary of the key clauses of a university’s licensing agreement and provides examples of possible disputes from each key clause. This review will be useful for negotiating and drafting a licensing agreement between a university and the biotechnology industry.

Latest